Health Care Bill Cracks Down on Abuses by Chartable Hospitals
By JOSEPH RHEE March 25, 2010 A little-known effect of the newly-signed health care bill will be sharp new guidelines to prevent so-called "charitable" non-profit hospitals from taking advantage of the people they are supposed to help. Non-profit hospitals have been under fire for years over tactics such as allegedly price-gouging the poor and using aggressive collection tactics to collect debts. Whistleblowers Dr. John Bagnato (left) and Charles
The curious case of Ken Hodges, Part III: Is Georgia Public Broadcasting hiding the ball on this matter?
(Note: Be sure to read Part I and Part II of this series.)
This week we’ve explored the curious case of Democrat Ken Hodges, candidate for Attorney General (Website | Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter) and the mystifying actions he allegedly took in his official capacity as the then-District Attorney of Dougherty County in a matter of whistle blowers and Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital in Albany. We’ve also examined the actions of Republican candidate for Governor, State Rep. Austin Scott (Website | Facebook |Twitter) who has been trying for years to uncover the allegedly systemic abuse of some non-profit hospitals like Phoebe Putney with regard to their charitable obligations as tax-exempt entities.
Now, a documentary has been completed on this most interesting matter. Titled Do No Harm, the documentary is produced by The Kindling Group, a “nonprofit organization dedicated to creating documentary films that explore critical social issues and channeling them into powerful tools for community engagement and change.”
Guess who won’t let this documentary air in Georgia?
Nancy Zintak, a spokeswoman for Georgia Public Broadcasting, said the statewide network has rejected the film. “The reason that we’re not airing it is basically is it was not balanced,” Zintak said. “It didn’t come to us like a vetted news journalistic program like ‘Frontline.’ It came from an independent, non-journalistic producer. There was no attempt to show another point of view.
“The door is not closed on the film, but as it stands right now, it wasn’t up to standards,” Zintak said.
Nancy Zintak (Blog | Twitter) certainly has an unusual viewpoint as to what has or has not been “vetted” to her standards or those of her superiors at GPB.
Let’s see who Nancy Zintak thinks is up to her standards, then.
Uhhh, Nancy Grace meets Zintak’s standards for fair and balanced? Nancy Grace?!? The woman who is nightly on the attack, irrespective of the facts? That Nancy Grace? And she’s going to work on a show called “Swift Justice”!?!
Evidently so.
But for Zintak to promote her reasons for not airing the documentary makes one wonder what those that have aired Do No Harm saw that she missed. Yes, quite a few other PBS stations nationwide have aired Do No Harm. For example:
* San Francisco, CA (KQED)
* Albuquerque, NM (KENW)
* Appleton, MN (KWCM)
* South Carolina State Network (Statewide PBS System)
* Louisiana State Network (Statewide PBS System)
* New Orleans (WLAE)
* East Lansing, MI (WKAR)
* Detroit, MI (WTVS)
* West Virginia (WVPB)
* Maryland Public Television (Statewide PBS System)
I wonder why ten PBS stations or networks felt that Do No Harm was perfectly reasonable to air there (including our neighboring state of South Carolina) but Zintak’s superiors felt that it couldn’t air here because of “bias.”
The curious case of Ken Hodges, Part II: guess which candidate for Governor has been trying to find the truth, as well as who else allegedly has been involved in this matter
Yesterday we discussed the curious case of Democrat Ken Hodges, candidate for Attorney General (Website | Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter), and the mystifying actions he allegedly took in his official capacity as the then-District Attorney of Dougherty County in a matter of whistle blowers and Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital in Albany.
As the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals considers Hodges’ arguments that he is immune from liability in this matter, that he did not abuse his power by issuing subpoenas for a non existent Grand Jury and indict whistle blower Charles Rehberg for a matter where there was absolutely no evidence, and after the latter took issue with the billing practices of the employer of Hodges’ wife (Phoebe Putney), it now appears that someone else at that point was also trying to examine Rehberg and Bagnato’s underlying point concerning the billing practices of non profit hospitals in Georgia.
Republican candidate for Governor, State Rep. Austin Scott (Website | Facebook |Twitter) has been trying for years to uncover the allegedly systemic abuse of some non-profit hospitals like Phoebe Putney with regard to their charitable obligations as tax-exempt entities.
[Note: Scott is an advertiser on Peach Pundit]
Scott’s interest in Phoebe Putney’s billing practices started, coincidentally, around the same time as Rehberg and Dr. John Bagnato became interested in the same issue. At the time, Phoebe Putney was doing business with then Democrat Majority Leader in the Georgia Senate, Charles Walker, Democrat State Senator George Hooks, and former Democrat Speaker of the Georgia House and now Deputy Commissioner at the Georgia Department of Agriculture, Terry Coleman. You’ll recall that Walker, an Augusta Democrat, was indicted in 2004 on 142-counts alleging numerous fraudulent schemes and tax evasion and convicted a year later.
[Note: In no way is this post to actually suggest any malfeasance on the part of Walker, Coleman or Hooks with Phoebe Putney or any other entity.]
Regardless, by September, 2004, Phoebe Putney was worried about the whistle blower claims made by Rehberg and Bagnato. Meanwhile, Austin Scott was conducting his own similar investigation into the relationship between appropriations from the then-Democrat controlled legislature to non profit entities like Phoebe Putney. As the electoral tide in Georgia was turning for the first time since Reconstruction, serious concerns were raised about the impact of these simultaneous investigations by ordinary citizens as well as an elected official.
In a September 20, 2004 e-mail, Charlie Hayslett, the CEO of the public relations firm Hayslett Group, which represents the Georgia Alliance of Community Hospitals, discussed the status of the story and the potential damaging impact it could have as additional information was learned about the relationship between Democrats in the General Assembly and community “non profit” hospitals in Georgia.
The discovery phase of the countersuit will almost certainly pull Jim Velghe and the ex-FBI agents into the spotlight, but it’s the contract story that is particularly troublesome; it holds the potential to produce shock waves that will be felt across the states. If Rep. Scott, a Republican, is smart (or getting good advise), he will announce that he is filing identical open records requests with every other community hospital in Georgia — and if he gets similar results, it will produce a statewide story with the potential to impact state legislative races in November and tip the balance of power in the House to the GOP. I don’t think this is an exaggeration. I think the steps we talked through this afternoon are appropriate, and I think it’s especially important that the PR team have an opportunity to evaluate the open records material before it goes to Scott.
Emphasis mine.
Interestingly, included in the e-mail distribution was Bob Baudino of Baudino Law Group, the very law firm which later hired…Ken Hodges! Baudino, you’ll recall, also represents Phoebe Putney, where Hodges’ wife worked.
Also of note is that C. Rick Langley was included on the e-mail distribution…the same C. Rick Langley who represented Phoebe Putney and was allegedly billed by Ken Hodges’ office for records collection related to subpoenas issued by the latter to identify the Phoebe Putney whistle blowers. Indeed, this correspondence from Hodges’ Chief Investigator to Langley forwarded “a bill from Bellsouth for phone records requested by Steve
Chenoweth.”
What is suspected, but cannot be confirmed, is that the “Steve Chenoweth” referenced on the letter from Hodges’ Chief Investigator (the one who “requested” the results of the subpoenas) is Stephen Chenoweth, Senior Vice President of Work Dynamics. What does Work Dynamics do?
Work Dynamics, Inc. is a private consulting firm that assist healthcare corporations meet current challenges and opportunities involving the human side of the organization to include: governing boards, physicians, employees and management. The firm is a unique blend of seasoned and highly experienced professionals who utilize state of the art technology and advanced diagnostic tools to formulate effective strategies and tactics designed to address issues, solve problems and achieve strategic objectives.
Remember how we discussed yesterday that Rehberg was allegedly accosted by representatives of Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital in his own parking lot on the evening of August 9, 2004? These individuals, allegedly retired Federal agents, supposedly demanded that Rehberg accompany them to a meeting with Phoebe Putney representatives, threatened him with criminal prosecutions, mentioned his family by name and attempted to force him to sign an “Immunity Agreement” immediately.
Mr. Chenoweth is Senior Vice President of Work Dynamics, Inc. He is retired from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. While with the FBI, Mr. Chenoweth served in various leadership capacities to include Supervisor in the Phoenix Division. He is a nationally recognized and accomplished investigator featured in documentary movies involving the FBI. In the course of his FBI career, he has managed SWAT teams, hostage negotiations and conducted a variety of investigations involving bank robberies, organized crime, fugitives, and complicated white collar crimes. Mr. Chenoweth manages and consults in the following firm services: Preventive Labor Relations, Corporate Crisis Management, and Corporate Investigative Services.
Emphasis mine.
Corporate Crisis Management and Corporate Investigative Services, indeed! And, allegedly, we should add, maintaining some sort of relationship concerning the results of subpoenas with Ken Hodges’ Chief Investigator in the Office of the District Attorney of Dougherty County.
If you think this is too much of a stretch, remember the comment in Hayslett’s e-mail concerning “Jim Velghe and the ex-FBI agents?” Well, guess who is president of Work Dynamics, Inc.? James C. Velghe, Sr.
But back to the point of this…the discussion of Scott in the e-mail from Hayslett.
It is most impressive that the efforts of Rep. Scott to bring some sunshine on the billing practices of community hospitals and those hospital’s relationships with appropriators in the General Assembly caused such worry and angst in some corners. It also speaks to the kind of Governor he could be in bringing reform and conservative values to the executive branch of Georgia’s government. It also makes much more understandable why the Georgia Alliance of Community Hospitals allegedly heavily bankrolled the candidacy of Michael Spinks in 2004 to run against Scott.
Back in 2004, Scott’s investigation was enough to leave certain people very worried that the issue he was pursuing was big enough to sweep Democrats out of power. Now, just last year, Scott introduced HR 75 on January 16, 2009 (before the recent scandal concerning Glenn Richardson), which would allow the State Attorney General to impanel a state-wide grand jury to investigate “corruption in the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the state, any political subdivision or municipality of the state, or any authority or instrumentality of the state…”
Noting Austin Scott’s impressive impact on the matter of charitable obligations for tax-exempt hospitals, the only question is if Georgia wants someone like Ken Hodges to be at the helm of any such grand jury as the next Attorney General of Georgia.
The curious case of Ken Hodges: your Democratic candidate for Attorney General
As has been noted of late in the AJC, Democrat Ken Hodges, candidate for Attorney General (Website | Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter) continues to be haunted by his actions last decade in a curious case of allegedly outrageous and improper actions undertaken by him in his capacity as then-District Attorney of Dougherty County.
The allegations, if true, call into serious and profound question the professionalism, honesty and capability of Ken Hodges to become the top law enforcement officer for Georgia.
But to understand the seriousness of the situation Hodges allegedly created for himself, let’s go back to the beginning.
The two of them were certain that they found irrefutable evidence that Putney was making hundreds of millions each year, charging unnecessarily high fees to their poor patients, all while their executives enjoyed handsome compensation and the hospital paid no taxes because of its non profit status. In February of 2004, the two of them decided to get this message out. In that month, on multiple occasions, Charles Rehberg ANONYMOUSLY sent out faxes to local business leaders and politicians.
But what exactly did Dr. Bagnato and Rehberg learn?
In effect, they found evidence to suggest Phoebe Putney failed to fulfill its charitable obligations as a tax-exempt entity.
Once executives at Phoebe Putney learned of these anonymous facsimile transmissions being sent around town, they allegedly contacted then-District Attorney Ken Hodges. With allegedly no knowledge of any illegal activity being perpetuated by the then unknown whistleblowers, Hodges issued a series of subpoenas on official letterhead from the Office of the District Attorney:
- On October 22, 2003 to Bell South
- On December 1, 2003 to Bell South
- On January 20, 2004 to Bell South
- On February 5, 2004 to Bell South
- On February 24, 2004 to Alltel
- On an unknown date during this time to Sprint
All subpoenas were issued for phone records related to telephone numbers for which Bagnato and Rehberg had access, or to telephone numbers which received the anonymous fax transmissions (like the office of Congressman Sanford Bishop). During this time an additional subpoena from Ken Hodges’ office (allegedly signed by Hodges himself) was also issued to internet service provider Exact Advertising, which produced to Hodges the personal and confidential e-mails from the personal computers of one of the whistle blowers.
What do we see here? Well, the document, filed with the Clerk of the Superior Court for Dougherty County on October 22, 2003 at 1:29 p.m. states that a Subpoena Compliance Officer is:
hereby required to be and appear at the Grand Jury for the Dougherty County Superior Court before the Honorable Loring Gray, Chief Judge of the Superior Court, in Room 216 of the Dougherty County Courthouse at 10:00 a.m. on the 5th day of November, 2003 and bring with you certain documents to be presented in a matter now pending; APD case #22-03-024016 (Harassing phone calls).
The other subpoenas take a similar lead from this one.
So what’s wrong with that? First, on the dates listed there was no Grand Jury meeting to consider any cases involving Dr. Bagnato or Charles Rehberg. Also, Harassing Phone Calls is a misdemeanor and not a felony (thus not requiring a Grand Jury to meet). It, per O.C.G.A. 16-11-39.1, requires someone to “telephone another person repeatedly, whether or not conversation ensues, for the purpose of annoying, harassing, or molesting another person of the family of such other person.”
Since neither Bagnato or Rehberg had sent their anonymous facsimile transmissions to any recipients to a degree that would be considered harassing, and with the clear fact that the subpoenas were issued containing a clear factual error regarding the impaneling of a Grand Jury, it is highly suspect what Ken Hodges’ motivations exactly were as his employees allegedly performed these tasks while in their official capacity.
Also highly unusual is that the result of the subpoenas (private e-mail messages and phone logs) were allegedly given to representatives of Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital. At least, attorneys in Albany who represented Phoebe Putney were sent bills for the retrieved records obtained as part of the subpoenas (of course, allegedly):
As the information requested by subpoena from Ken Hodges’ office was reviewed, Charles Rehberg was sued by Phoebe Putney for 60 million dollars for defamation of character and harassment. The lawsuit, it should be noted, was later dismissed.
But Rehberg’s life took an unusual term when he was allegedly accosted by representatives of Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital in his own parking lot on the evening of August 9, 2004. These individuals, allegedly retired Federal agents, demanded that Rehberg accompany them to a meeting with Phoebe Putney representatives, threatened him with criminal prosecutions, mentioned his family by name and attempted to force him to sign an “Immunity Agreement” immediately.
So what did this “Immunity Agreement” say? Let’s review the first page of said document.
WHEREAS, Phoebe Putney has been the target of a corporate campaign including anonymous facsimiles and other schemes designed to harm the business of Phoebe Putney and to create dissention between its Boards and management; and
WHEREAS, Rehberg has actively participated in the distribution of facsimiles and other information for purposes of harming Phoebe Putney and creating dissention between its Boards and management staff; and
WHEREAS, Phoebe Putney contends that Rehberg’s conduct violates both federal and state criminal statues; and
WHEREAS, Phoebe Putney has prepared civil litigation against Rehberg which includes claims for defamation, tortious interference with business relationships, RICO violations as well as other causes of action which, if successful, will result in personal liability of Rehberg for potentially millions of dollars; and
WHEREAS, Phoebe Putney has caused the District Attorney of Dougherty County, Georgia to open a case against those responsible for the facsimiles and other schemes designed to harm the business of Phoebe Putney and to create dissention between its Boards and management; and
WHEREAS, Rehberg and Phoebe Putney desire to resolve all criminal and civil claims which Phoebe Putney may have against Rehberg in exchange for Rehberg’s cooperation including, but not limited to, the identification and prosecution of other conspirators engaged in the schemes designed to harm Phoebe Putney’s business and to bring dissension between its Board and management;
NOW, THEREFORE, Phoebe Putney and Rehberg agree as follows:
1. Rehberg agrees that he shall cooperate by giving information and sworn testimony whenever requested to either law enforcement officials or representatives of Phoebe Putney[.]
Emphasis above is mine.
What is known is that the individuals who confronted Rehberg were not from Ken Hodges’ office. But they sure seem to know what is going on there, especially that “Phoebe Putney has caused the District Attorney of Dougherty County, Georgia to open a case against those responsible for the facsimiles and other schemes designed to harm the business of Phoebe Putney and to create dissention between its Boards and management[.]”
Huh. A non-profit hospital has compelled the elected District Attorney for Dougherty County to start an investigation? Most interesting and perplexing that people outside Ken Hodges’ office seem to know an awful lot about what is going on inside said office as they try to have someone sign a document that clearly is to the benefit of Phoebe Putney. All allegedly, of course.
This incident resulted in a letter from Rehberg’s attorney to Ken Hodges.
In the missive from attorney Robert E. Mulholland, Hodges was formally put on notice about the alleged events of August 9, 2004 and asked to investigate.
And Ken Hodges, your Democrat candidate for Attorney General, did respond.
On December 14, 2005, Charles Rehberg was indicted on charges of aggravated assault, burglary and “harassing telephone calls” in Dougherty County, involving allegedly an interaction with Dr. James Hotz, affiliated with Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital. This indictment came without any investigation by the Albany Police Department or any other police agency.
Hodges’ Chief Investigator, James Paulk (the same guy who handled the subpoenas) later testified in a deposition the Albany Police Department wasn’t involved because of “lack of confidence in the City police department to handle it.” Interestingly, he handled the investigation allegedly without interviewing any witnesses or gathering any evidence. If he had done so, he would have learned that Rehberg had never even been to Hotz’s residence. (Don’t forget that in the subpoena above, issued by Paulk, he referenced Albany Police Department case number #22-03-024016 (Harassing phone calls). Strange how he could do so and then admit that APD wasn’t involved.)
But that didn’t stop the media spectacle of the arrest of whistleblower Charles Rehberg by Ken Hodges’ office.
What happened with this amazing case put together by Ken Hodges’ crack team? It was dismissed prior to a hearing concerning the legal sufficiency of the indictment.
But that doesn’t stop the prosecutions. While Hodges’ has rescued himself from the matter by this point, he allegedly was still working in the background with regard to this matter.
Thus, a second indictment was issued against Rehberg (again involving the same alleged victim) on February 16, 2006 which included charges of simple assault and harassing telephone calls.
As before, the defense filed motions attacking the legal sufficiency of the indictment due to the fact that Rehberg still had never been to Hotz’s home and there was no evidence to support the matter proceeding. On April 10, 2006, the prosecution announced a second time that they would dismiss the matter. For some reason, though, they didn’t do so. It wasn’t until July 7, 2006 that the Superior Court of Dougherty County dismissed the indictment based upon the statement from the prosecution in open court.
Think we’re done yet?
A third indictment was secured against Rehberg, again for “simple assault” and harassing telephone calls.” Can you guess what happened? Yup, Judge Harry Altman issued orders dismissing the charges again against Rehberg.
Say, did I mention that Ken Hodges’ wife, Melissa Hodges, worked for Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital? She’s listed on an employee list here and also was very visible in her role with the Hospital.
Although the dates above on the web page found are more recent, she had been a Phoebe Putney employee throughout this ordeal.
Did I also mention that Ken Hodges, while District Attorney, received campaign contributions from Phoebe Putney?
Surely I must have mentioned that Ken Hodges is now employed by Baudino Law Group, which counts as one of its main clients Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital in Albany?
Sick of the alleged abuse of power from Ken Hodges’ office, Rehberg sued Hodges (among others) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia accusing him of an illegal and improper abuse of power. Hodges, represented ironically enough by the Attorney General of Georgia (the very office he aspires to run), made a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. That motion was denied by the District Court.
This last week, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals heard Hodges’ appeal of the lower court denial of his motion. That is where the case currently sits, awaiting a decision from the jurists there.
A most curious case this is where Hodges allegedly is involved in matters for which his office in Albany had no interests and for which he has yet to give a true accounting of his actions. One also must wonder if this is the type of man Georgia needs as its top law enforcement officer and who he could act in similar fashion against if given the opportunity to hold such office.
But this story is not yet complete. Check back later this week for more on this matter and a candidate for Governor who has been trying to get to the bottom of these allegations concerning community hospitals for awhile.
Ex-DA has immunity from being sued, his lawyer argues
Former Dougherty County District Attorney Ken Hodges can't be sued for actions
he took as a prosecutor, his attorney argued Thursday before a three-judge
panel in the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta.
Hodges, the former Albany district attorney now running for the Democratic
nomination for Georgia's attorney general, is being sued along with two
other men by an Albany accountant who claims the trio fabricated testimony
in an attempt to frame him on behalf of a powerful southwest Georgia
hospital system.
Hodges, who did not attend the hearing Thursday, was represented by Michelle
Hirsch, a staff lawyer in the office of state Attorney General Thurbert
Baker. Because Hodges is being sued for actions he took while a state
prosecutor, Baker's office is representing him as well as co-defendants
Kelly Burke, another prosecutor appointed to the case after Hodges recused
himself, and James Paulk, a Dougherty County investigator.
When Hodges and Burke were building a criminal case in 2005 against accountant
Charles Rehberg and Albany surgeon Dr. John Bagnato, they were doing so in
their capacity as prosecutors, Hirsch said, which "falls under the
cloak of immunity."
Rehberg and Bagnato were indicted by a grand jury on three occasions on
charges that stemmed from their sending of anonymous faxes to business and
political leaders in Albany that were critical of the Phoebe Putney Health
System. After the hospital system asked Hodges to investigate, he used grand
jury subpoenas to acquire phone records that led to Rehberg, even though no
grand jury was investigating the case at the time. A judge dismissed the
criminal charges each time.
The appeals court judges did not rule Thursday, and it is unclear when they
will. The judges' questions centered not on the facts of the case but on
legal precedents and rules of civil procedure. The hearing Thursday was on
the defendants' appeal of the trial judge's decision to deny their motion to
dismiss the case.
Rehberg's attorney, Bryan Vroon of Atlanta, argued Thursday that Hodges and
Paulk, and later Burke, conspired to fabricate testimony to gain the
indictments. Hodges recused himself from the case in May 2005 after The
Atlanta Journal-Constitution wrote about the case. But, Vroon said, Hodges
admitted he continued to work on the case, which stripped him of his
immunity.
"We argue he was not entitled to immunity because his efforts were as an
investigator," not a prosecutor, he said.
Political Insider
Your morning jolt: Georgia Public Broadcasting rejects Phoebe Putney documentary
Last year, we told you of an independent documentary that looked at the 2003 clash between two whistle-blowers in Albany, Ga., and the nonprofit Phoebe Putney Health System – southwest Georgia’s largest hospital group.
The film, “Do No Harm,” has political implications. It includes a deal of footage on the actions of then-Dougherty County district attorney Ken Hodges, who is now a Democratic candidate for attorney general. Hodges faces state Rep. Rob Teilhet (D-Smyrna) in a July primary. Hodges leads in fund-raising.
Public broadcasting stations and networks in several states, including South Carolina and Louisiana, have scheduled “Do No Harm” for broadcast. But you will not see it in Georgia – at least not now.
Nancy Zintak, a spokeswoman for Georgia Public Broadcasting, said the statewide network has rejected the film. “The reason that we’re not airing it is basically is it was not balanced,” Zintak said. “It didn’t come to us like a vetted news journalistic program like ‘Frontline.’ It came from an independent, non-journalistic producer. There was no attempt to show another point of view.
“The door is not closed on the film, but as it stands right now, it wasn’t up to standards,” Zintak said.
GPB is a network of nine public TV stations that cover most of the state. We’ve got a call into WPBA-TV, an Atlanta PBS outlet, which could decide separately whether it will air the documentary.
In 2004, Hodges’ office tracked down a series of faxed messages to Albany community and business leaders that challenged the way the hospital group did business. The authors were accountant Charles Rehberg and surgeon John Bagnato, who said they were attempting to draw attention to the lack of charitable care offered by the tax-exempt facility.
Hodges’ office used grand jury subpoenas to obtain phone records that led back to the pair. The district attorney then passed the information to Phoebe Putney, permitting the hospital system to file a civil suit against the whistleblowers. A countersuit was settled out of court.
Hodges, now a member of the Baudino Law Group in Atlanta, says he did nothing wrong. But after his role was publicized, Hodges recused himself from the later criminal prosecution of the fax-senders — charges that were later dropped.
A federal wrongful prosecution lawsuit, filed by Rehberg, the Albany accountant, includes Hodges among its targets. The case makes an appearance before the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals this week.
In the past, Hodges has dismissed “Do No Harm” as propaganda generated on behalf of litigators attempting to target non-profit hospital systems across the country.
“Georgia Public Broadcasting has a long, proud history of airing straight-down-the-middle news stories and thorough, balanced documentaries. They recognize that this movie isn’t one of those. We agree with their decision not to air it,” Hodges campaign spokesman Jonathan Williams said Monday morning in an e-mail.
Not many are currently anxious to add to the discussion. Denise Godoy spoke for “Do No Harm” producer and director Rebbeca Schanberg of Chicago. “The filmmaker respects the [GPB] decision and hopes to work with them in the future,” she said.
Teilhet, Hodges’ Democratic opponent, had no comment.
Also in the race for attorney general are Republicans Sam Olens, the Cobb County Commission chairman, and Max Woods of Macon, a former U.S. attorney for Georgia’s Middle District.
Olens, too, declined comment. “I’m certainly concerned about the ethical implications that have been alleged, but it would be inappropriate to make a comment as I’ve, frankly, not seen the documentary, nor have seen other materials related to it,” he said in a morning phone interview.